Visit the official COVID-19 government website to stay informed: 

+27 12 940 1947
75 Durham Road, 
Clubview, Centurion
+27 10 597 7810
on 156 Bram Fischer Drive, Ferndale, Johannesburg
+27 10 447 3676
5 Neven Street, 
Modelpark, Emalahleni

On 7 January 2020 China identified a new virus known as the Corona Virus, later labelled COVID-19. The starting point: a market in Wuhan, China. From there COVID-19 spread at a rapid speed to the rest of Asia, Europe and eventually to South Africa where the first case of the virus was diagnosed on the 5th of March 2020.

To face the battle, the President of South Africa declared a national State of Disaster in Government Gazette 43096 in terms of the Disaster Management Act, Act 57 of 2002.

A state of disaster is defined as “a progressive or sudden, widespread or localised, natural or human-caused occurrence which-

(a)       cause or threatens to cause –

(i)         death, injury or disease;

(ii)        damage to property, infrastructure or the environment; or

(iii)       disruption of the life of a community; and

(b)       is of a magnitude that exceeds the ability of those affected by the disaster to cope with its effects using only their own resources,” 

A State of Disaster, in a nutshell, allow the Government to issue regulations to manage the disaster. In the COVID-19 case, the regulations pertain to the treatment of the infected persons, but also for the control of movement of all people and goods. The regulations also restrict the sale of certain items such as alcohol and cigarettes.

Monday, 23 March 2020, President Ramaphosa addressed South Africa and introduced us to the term “Lockdown”. This was by far the most aggressive step the Government took in the battle with COVID-19. On 25 March 2020, a regulation was published to inform South Africa what is expected of them during Lockdown. The portion of the regulation that made us all appreciate our homes reads as follows:

“every person is confined to his or her place of residence, unless strictly for the purpose of performing an essential service, obtaining an essential good or service, collecting a social grant, or seeking emergency, life-saving, or chronic medical attention”

Your rights under a State of Disaster vs a State of Emergency

 Thus taking your dog for a walk does not qualify for a reason to leave your residence.

The above clearly restricts fundamental human rights such as the right of freedom of movement and freedom of conducting trade.

The regulation further states that any person that contravenes the regulation shall be guilty of an offence and, on conviction, liable to a fine or imprisonment for a period not exceeding six months. The SAPS has been instructed to enforce the regulations and the SANDF has been deployed to play an assisting role in the enforcement process.

Two recent cases attempted to challenge it, without success:

Freedom of movement – to attend funeral

In the ex parte application of Karel Willem van Heerden the applicant approached the Mpumalanga High Court to obtain an order to exempt him from the lockdown so that he could travel from Mpumalanga to the Eastern Cape. The reason for this was to attend to the arrangement and funeral of his grandfather.

Freedom of trade

In the matter of Hola Bon Renaissance Foundation v The President of RSA the applicant approached the Constitutional Court to interdict the President and State to implement the Lockdown. This was to ensure that companies can trade as normal.

One might wonder if it can become worse and unfortunately it can.  If needs be the Government can take an even more drastic step and declare a State of Emergency as per the State of Emergency Act, Act 64 of 1997.

A State of Emergency is declared in terms of Section 37 of the Constitution and reads as follows: “A state of emergency may be declared only in terms of an Act of Parliament, and only when—

  • the life of the nation is threatened by war, invasion, general insurrection, disorder, natural disaster or other public emergency; and
  • the declaration is necessary to restore peace and order.”

The implication of a State of Emergency would be that virtually all constitutional rights and civil liberties, with exception of the right to dignity and life, are suspended, for the duration of the State of Emergency.

In a State of Emergency the SANDF would become the enforcer and the SAPS would play the supporting role.  Soldiers can order anyone to leave a place, and use the necessary force to do so if it’s believed to be for public safety. Soldiers can detain someone or even arrest someone without a warrant. It’s important to notice that the SANDF detains a person, not the SAPS, thus no bail application.

In a State of Emergency the Government can order that freedom of the press and certain forms of communications, such as communication using the internet, can be restricted if the need arises.

So, in short, most of your human rights are currently protected. However, failure to adhere to the request to confine to your residence, can have far worst implications on your human rights that the current lockdown.

Written by Chris Liebenberg

084 561 0843

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

Drunk & driving: what you need to know during the festive season

What defines Drunk and Driving? Section 65 of the National Road Traffic Act 93 of 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “The Act”) defines driving under the influence under two scenarios: Driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or a drug having a narcotic effect, or with an excessive amount of alcohol in blood or […]

Read More
Revenge is a dish best served not at all!

In South Africa, the rights and dignity of the individual has been expanded in line with international norms on the scourge that has come to be known as “revenge porn”. The Films and Publications Amendment Act of 2019 has criminalised knowingly distributing private images and footage of sexual and/or compromising nature of a person without […]

Read More
The legal consequences of road rage

In the article Road rage and reasoning about responsibility SACJ (2001) 14, Shannon Hoctor of the University of Port Elizabeth, describes road rage in the following manner at 195: "Whilst the exact ambit of the term is rendered somewhat vague by misuse, it is clear that road rage is a product of the confluence of […]

Read More
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram